Introduction

Information about the health of the landscapes we manage is essential to achieve the BLM mission (Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976). It enables BLM to measure the benefits that these lands and waters provide, understand the effects of multiple uses, and thus create management plans to sustain these landscapes for future generations.

This report provides information about the health of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This information was collected on-the-ground by field biologists who measure and assess important indicators related to ecosystem health. In terrestrial ecosystems, they focus on cover and composition of plant species, plant height, gaps between plant canopies, and stability of soils. In aquatic ecosystems, they focus on water quality, stream morphology, and biological characteristics. These quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments were collected under the BLM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) program. For more information about AIM, see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org/learn-3/about/.

This report also includes relevant standard geospatial datasets. Some relate to ecosystem health, while others provide contextual information about landscapes such as the management activities occurring there.

This report was generated through partnership among the BLM National Operations Center, USDA-ARS Jornada, and the BLM National Aquatic Monitoring Center.

Report Purpose and use

The purpose of this report is to describe key indicators of ecosystem health across an area of interest. This information can be used to evaluate whether or not goals or desired conditions are being achieved across BLM lands, an essential step in adaptive management. Specific management applications include but are not limited to: treatment effectiveness, Land Health Standards evaluation, sage-grouse habitat analysis and Resource Management Plan effectiveness. Tables, graphs, and other content from this report can be pasted into decision-making documents, or the entire report can be used as an appendix to such documents.

The standard core indicators contained in this report are relevant to management questions across all BLM ecosystem types, as identified through the BLM AIM Strategy and related efforts (TN440, TR1735-1). This report also contains standard national geospatial datasets managed by the BLM National Operations Center and partners. These geospatial datasets provide spatial and management context for the standard AIM core indicators.

Report Organization

This report has five main sections. The introduction sets the stage. The data summary provides contextual information that is helpful for interpreting the results, including the list of indicators, time period, timing of sampling, and maps.

Report results begin with the goals, monitoring objectives, benchmarks, and results summary section. This contains tables of which indicators met specified objectdives by reporting unit, and a summary of the stated objectdives. These table can be used by BLM land managers to evaluate whether goals or management objectives were achieved. This table is a summary of results for all indicators.

The indicator estimates by reporting unit for monitoring objectives section identifies the condition of each indicator for each area of interest or reporting unit. Condition refers to the proportion of land or water resources that is achieving desired values known as benchmarks. This section provides further detail about each row of the table in the previous section and can be used as supporting information for the conclusions drawn from that table. This is followed by the spatial distribution of core indicators section which provides remote-sensing-derived maps of various core indicators for the study area.

Finally, the appendices contain additional background information on AIM, the core indicators and methods, and the analysis approaches used to generate this reports.

Information Sources

This report summarizes and analyzes information collected from an AIM project. The following information sources were used in the analysis presented in this report:

  • The Monitoring Design Worksheet summarises the goals and objectives of the monitoring project.
  • The AIM Data Analysis Template provides data summaries of the AIM data collected for the project and clearly states the objectives, indicators, benchmarks, and required landscape proportions for each objective.
  • AIM data from TerrADat are the quantitative data collected in the field for the project.
  • The project’s Sample Design Database captures all of the technical details of the project sample design (e.g., sample frame, stratification, initial point selections, fate of the sample points, and design weights). This information is used to adjust the sample point weights to produce unbiased estimates.
  • Spatial data files defining the different levels of reporting units for which estimates will be generated from the AIM data.
  • Spatial or tabular Information defining benchmark classes (i.e., categories assigned to each sample point for the purpose of evaluating an indicator against a benchmark that may change across a landscape).
  • (OPTIONAL) - Additional sample points from the BLM Landscape Monitoring Framework to supplement the AIM project data.
  • (OPTIONAL) - Remote sensing products such as the Grass/Shrub continuous variable predictions or the Landfire EVT map to supplement the quantitative field-derived estimates.

Interpreting the Results

Results in this report can be used to evaluate whether goals regarding ecosystem health are being achieved across a landscape. Success criteria for each goal are specified as measureable monitoring objectives that include a natural resource indicator of interest, a benchmark that identifies desired values of that indicator, and the proportion of the landscape that should meet the benchmark. This report provides statistical estimates of the proportion of the landscape achieving the monitoring objectives, in the form of tables, graphs and other information (see summary in objectives, benchmarks, and landscape thresholds or detailed info in condition estimates by objective). BLM land managers requesting the report supplied relevant goals, monitoring objectives and reporting units as part of the process of designing their monitoring effort (see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org/design). Upon receipt, it will be the responsibility of BLM land managers to evaluate whether goals are achieved and make management recommendations.

Consider important contextual information when you evaluate whether goals are achieved:

  • Monitoring objectives: Are benchmarks well-justified and based on best available knowledge? Are desired proportions informed by management goals and landscape context?
  • Reporting unit: Is this appropriate to evaluate whether goals are achieved?
  • Timing of sampling: Is sample timing appropriate for the ecosystem type as well as the goals and objectives for the reporting unit? Does sample timing vary between years? Does sample timing affect your results?
  • Sample spread/point fates: Are monitoring sites distributed across the area of interest? Were some areas systematically missed, which could lead to bias?

Analysis Outputs

In addition to this report from which charts and tablar data can be copied/pasted, the following standard outputs are created as part of this analysis:

  • Data table containing the plot-level raw data from TerrADat combined with the adjusted point weights (input for analysis).
  • Data table listing each monitoring objective with its indicator(s), benchmarks, and required landsdcape proportions (input for analysis).
  • Data table listing the categories assigned by indicator to each point based on the benchmarks (input for analysis).
  • Data table containing the analysis results of the category analyses by reporting unit (spsurvey cat.analysis output table).

Additional Information

For additional information, please see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org or contact ekachergis@blm.gov.


Data Summary

The following tabs contain tables and graphs describing the information in this report and the sampling effort. This includes the indicators being considered, the time period of sampling, descriptions of the actual sampling effort relative to the original sampling design, and a map of the sample points and reporting units.

Map of Study Area, Reporting Units, and Sample Points

The map below is provided for general reference only. It was created from the spatial data stored in the project’s Sample Design Database, the reporting units provided for this analysis, and the actual sample point locations recorded in TerrADat. The map is dynamic - you can pan and zoom it. Layers may also be toggled on/off to view specific features.

Indicators included in the report

The following indicators were specified in the AIM data analysis template and are included in this report:

  • Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

  • Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

  • Bare Soil (%)

  • Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%)

  • Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

  • Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

  • Overall Soil Stability Rating

  • Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

  • Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

  • Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

  • Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

Time period of the report

This report covers data collected between 2015-06-02 and 2016-08-03. Timing of the data collection in each year is shown below.

Plot Sampling Summary

Not all points originally selected as part of a design can be sampled. Selected points may not be accessible or when evaluated may be deemed to not even be part of the population. The Rejection Criteria page on the AIM Landscape Toolbox website describes the rejection criteria for evaluating plots. To properly adjust the sampling weights and ensure unbiased estimates, it is important to know the fate of each of the originally-selected points. The graph below summarizes the point fates for the sample design(s) considered in this report.

Target sampled points are those that occurred on BLM lands and were visited by a field crew. Inaccessible points were ones that were on BLM lands, but for one reason or another, the crew could not physically access the site (e.g., needed to cross private land and access was denied, road was washed out). Non-target points refers to points that upon evaluation were determined to not be on BLM lands or occurred in water. Unknown points are those for which their fate was not recorded. If sampling objectives (e.g., condition estimate or confidence interval width) were achieved without sampling all of the selected points, then any excess points could be marked as Unneeded (this is not common in terrestrial AIM studies).

Stratum Sampling Info

The initial designs considered for this report used stratification as a way to spread sampling effort across the study area. The extent to which estimates calculated from monitoring data reflect conditions across the study area depends on whether or not the strata were adequately sampled. It is not uncommon for some sample sites to be not visited for various reasons (e.g., inaccessibility, time ran out). This is typically not a problem as long as: 1) the missed points do not account for a majority of the selected sample points and 2) the points that were not sampled were missed at random (i.e, there was no pattern to which points were missed and which were sampled). The table below summarizes the total calculated area and estimated sampling area by design stratum for the study area. Separate strata sampling proportions are calculated for each reporting unit, but looking at the study area overall gives a good rough estimation of whether or not there were issues with how the sample data represents the different strata. If there are strata with very low sampled proportions, this may affect the ability to draw inferences beyond the sample data in these strata, and should be more thoroughly evaluated.

Design Stratum # Design Points # Sampled Points Prop. Design Points Sampled Estimated Stratum Area (ha) Stratum Area Sampled Calculated Point Weight (ha/pt)
Basin_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist 13 9 0.69 7492.63 5187.20 576.36
Big_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist 18 10 0.56 62328.47 34626.93 3462.69
Big_Sagebrush_Warm_Dry 33 12 0.36 164495.67 59816.61 4984.72
Black_Sagebrush 13 9 0.69 17180.00 11893.85 1321.54
Low_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist 37 20 0.54 204141.18 110346.58 5517.33
Low_Sagebrush_Warm_Dry 13 7 0.54 10305.80 5549.28 792.75
Meadow_Dry 4 2 0.50 631.14 315.57 157.79
Salt_Desert_Mix 22 7 0.32 85976.33 27356.10 3908.01
Unknown_&_Aspen 14 2 0.14 36810.18 5258.60 2629.30

Goals, Monitoring Objectives, Benchmarks, and Results Summary

This table summarizes the results of this report. It contains broad goals as well as monitoring objectives and whether they were achieved based on available monitoring data for the area of interest. Monitoring objectives include key indicators, benchmarks that define desired values of the indicators, and the proportion of the landscape required to meet benchmarks. Together, this information can be used by BLM land managers to determine whether goals are being achieved and to recommend changes in management, if needed.

Note that the Monitoring Objectives and Benchmarks listed here are directly from the Terrestrial Benchmark Workbook that was filled out by the field office.

Results Summary

Objectives Met: NO

Managment Question Indicator Objective Met? Reporting Unit
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Bruneau Field Office
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Bruneau Field Office
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Likely No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Possibly No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Possibly No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Big Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) No Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Likely No Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Likely No Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Likely No Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Likely No Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) No Little Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) No Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Likely No Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Likely No Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Likely No Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Possibly No Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Possibly No Pole Creek

Objectives Met: AT THRESHOLD

Managment Question Indicator Objective Met? Reporting Unit
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Birch Creek-Snake River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Birch Creek-Snake River
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Dickshooter Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Jacks Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Lower Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Battle Creek
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Lower Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Marys Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold McDonald Creek-Bruneau River
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Middle Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Middle Blue Creek
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Miller Water-Bruneau River
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Pole Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Ross Slough-Owyhee River
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Shoofly Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Shoofly Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Shoofly Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Shoofly Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Shoofly Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Shoofly Creek
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Upper Battle Creek
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Upper Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Blue Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Sheep Creek
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating At threshold Upper Sheep Creek
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) At threshold Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) At threshold Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River

Goals, Objectives, Results and Benchmarks by Reporting Unit

These tables below summarize the results of specific indicators that were evaluated against management objectives and reporting units that were defined in the Monitoring Design Worksheet. A seprate table is presented for each reporting unit, and these tables state the indicators, evaluation categories, and required landscape proportion that should be met for each management question. The estimated proportion of the reporting unit in the different categories, upper and lower confidence intervals (CI), and a statement of whether the stated objective was met (based on the required landscape percent) are also presented.This information can be used by BLM land managers to determine whether goals are being achieved and to recommend changes in management, if needed.

Reporting Unit Level: Bruneau Field Office

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 14 21.48 10.85 32.11 No
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 43 57.47 47.91 67.03 No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 33 38.33 27.63 49.02 No
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 33 38.33 27.63 49.02 No
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 38 56.17 45.04 67.30 No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 38 56.17 45.04 67.30 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 33 38.33 27.63 49.02 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 33 38.33 27.63 49.02 No

Reporting Unit Level: Big Jacks Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 2 49.98 0.00 100.00 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 0.09 0.00 0.27 No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 3 44.45 0.61 88.29 No
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 3 44.45 0.61 88.29 No
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 77.78 38.13 100.00 Possibly No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 77.78 38.13 100.00 Possibly No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 3 44.45 0.61 88.29 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 3 44.45 0.61 88.29 No

Reporting Unit Level: Birch Creek-Snake River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 30.54 0.00 61.39 No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 49.94 0.00 99.88 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 49.94 0.00 99.88 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 92.70 77.40 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 92.70 77.40 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 49.94 0.00 99.88 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 49.94 0.00 99.88 Likely No

Reporting Unit Level: Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 1.46 0.00 5.69 No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 1.46 0.00 5.69 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %

Reporting Unit Level: Dickshooter Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 40.76 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 59.24 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 59.24 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 59.24 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 59.24 0.00 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Jacks Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 15.99 0.00 47.51 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 15.99 0.00 47.51 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 52.03 1.11 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 52.03 1.11 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 15.99 0.00 47.51 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 15.99 0.00 47.51 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Little Jacks Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 4 2.27 0.00 6.16 No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 23.09 0.00 66.21 No
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 23.09 0.00 66.21 No
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 1.43 0.00 4.27 No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 1.43 0.00 4.27 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 23.09 0.00 66.21 No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 23.09 0.00 66.21 No

Reporting Unit Level: Lower Battle Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 80.45 18.80 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 80.45 18.80 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 80.45 18.80 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 80.45 18.80 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Lower Sheep Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 27.22 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 51.48 6.27 96.70 No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 30.50 0.00 75.06 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 30.50 0.00 75.06 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 58.09 11.16 100.00 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 58.09 11.16 100.00 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 30.50 0.00 75.06 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 30.50 0.00 75.06 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Marys Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 1 51.69 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 51.69 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 51.69 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 51.69 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 51.69 0.00 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: McDonald Creek-Bruneau River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.52 0.00 16.83 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.52 0.00 16.83 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 96.48 83.17 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 96.48 83.17 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.52 0.00 16.83 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.52 0.00 16.83 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Middle Blue Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 4 77.47 44.60 100.00 Likely No
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 3.16 0.00 9.72 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Miller Water-Bruneau River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 76.49 6.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 1 38.24 0.00 91.23 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 11.76 0.00 35.64 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 11.76 0.00 35.64 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 88.24 64.36 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 88.24 64.36 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 11.76 0.00 35.64 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 11.76 0.00 35.64 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Pole Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 5 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 4 86.72 59.34 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 4 86.72 59.34 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 83.09 51.97 100.00 Possibly No
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 3 83.09 51.97 100.00 Possibly No
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 4 86.72 59.34 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 4 86.72 59.34 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Ross Slough-Owyhee River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Shoofly Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 99.93 99.64 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 1 0.07 0.00 0.36 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 0.07 0.00 0.36 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 0.07 0.00 0.36 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 0.07 0.00 0.36 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 1 0.07 0.00 0.36 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Upper Battle Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 67.20 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 32.80 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 32.80 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold

Reporting Unit Level: Upper Blue Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 0.78 0.00 3.81 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 0.78 0.00 3.81 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %

Reporting Unit Level: Upper Sheep Creek

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 83.35 28.96 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 % 1 83.35 28.96 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 %

Reporting Unit Level: Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River

Management Question Indicator Category Required Percent n Estimated Percent Lower CI Upper CI Objective Met?
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 80 % 1 50.00 0.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Meeting >= 90 %
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Meeting >= 80 % 2 100.00 100.00 100.00 At threshold

Benchmarks

Management Question Indicator Benchmark Source Evaluation Stratum Category Evaluation Benchmark
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Meeting 15<= SagebrushCover_AH <=25
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 0<= SagebrushCover_AH <15
GRSG Habitat Objectives Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 25< SagebrushCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= InvAnnGrassCover_AH <=10
Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< InvAnnGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Warm Dry Meeting 10<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Dry Meadow Meeting 35<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=50
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Cool Moist Meeting 20<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=40
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Cool Moist Meeting 20<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=45
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Salt Desert Mix Meeting 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Unknown/Aspen Meeting 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=35
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Black Sage Meeting 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Warm Dry Meeting 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Basin Sage Cool Moist Meeting 10<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Basin Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <10
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Black Sage Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Black Sage Not Meeting 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <10
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Basin Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <20
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 45< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Salt Desert Mix Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Salt Desert Mix Not Meeting 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Dry Meadow Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <35
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Dry Meadow Not Meeting 50< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <20
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Unknown/Aspen Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Unknown/Aspen Not Meeting 35< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 40< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Meeting 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF Outside GRSG PHMA Meeting 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Meeting 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites outside PHMA Meeting 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites outside PHMA Meeting 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Meeting 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF Outside GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites outside PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites outside PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15
Land Health Standard: Native Plants Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Basin Sage Cool Moist Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <35
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Cool Moist Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <35
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Warm Dry Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Cool Moist Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Warm Dry Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Black Sage Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <25
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Dry Meadow Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <25
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Salt Desert Mix Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <50
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Unknown/Aspen Meeting 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <30
Land Health Standard: Soils Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Loamy Soils Meeting 4<= SoilStability_All <=6
Land Health Standard: Soils Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Sandy Soils Meeting 2<= SoilStability_All <=6
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps > 200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_200_plus <=10
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_101_200 <=10
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_51_100 <=10
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Dry Meadow Not Meeting 25<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Salt Desert Mix Not Meeting 50<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Black Sage Not Meeting 25<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Unknown/Aspen Not Meeting 30<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Basin Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 35<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 35<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Big Sage Warm Dry Not Meeting 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Bare Soil (%) Ecological Site Descriptions Low Sage Cool Moist Not Meeting 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Loamy Soils Not Meeting 0<= SoilStability_All <4
Land Health Standard: Soils Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Sandy Soils Not Meeting 0<= SoilStability_All <2
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps > 200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_200_plus <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_101_200 <=100
Land Health Standard: Soils Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_51_100 <=100
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Sandy Soils Meeting 2<= SoilStability_All <=6
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Loamy Soils Meeting 4<= SoilStability_All <=6
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps > 200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_200_plus <=10
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_101_200 <=10
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Meeting 0<= GapPct_51_100 <=10
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Sandy Soils Not Meeting 0<= SoilStability_All <2
Land Health Standard: Watershed Overall Soil Stability Rating Ecological Site Descriptions Loamy Soils Not Meeting 0<= SoilStability_All <4
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps > 200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_200_plus <=100
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_101_200 <=100
Land Health Standard: Watershed Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm Ecological Site Descriptions Study Area Not Meeting 10< GapPct_51_100 <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Meeting 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF Outside GRSG PHMA Meeting 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Meeting 30<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=80
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Meeting 40<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=80
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Meeting 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Meeting 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites outside PHMA Meeting 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites outside PHMA Meeting 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF In GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) Policy - HAF Outside GRSG PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=30
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 80< SagebrushHgt_Avg <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <40
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Average Sagebrush Height (cm) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 80< SagebrushHgt_Avg <=100
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites in PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Arid Sites outside PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10
Land Health Standard: Wildlife Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) Policy - HAF Mesic Sites outside PHMA Not Meeting 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15

Indicator Estimates by Reporting Unit for Monitoring Objectives

This section identifies the condition of each indicator for each area of interest or reporting unit. Condition refers to the proportion of land or water resources that is achieving desired values known as benchmarks. This section provides further detail about each row of the table in the previous section and can be used as supporting information for the conclusions drawn from that table. Specifically, for each indicator, the following are reported:

Results by Reporting Unit

Study Area : Bruneau Field Office

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 45 48.97 5.503 38.18 59.76
Not Meeting 33 51.03 5.503 40.24 61.82

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 66 85.85 3.521 78.95 92.75
Not Meeting 12 14.15 3.521 7.251 21.05

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 21 25.72 4.726 16.46 34.98
Not Meeting 57 74.28 4.726 65.02 83.54

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 38 56.17 5.676 45.04 67.3
Not Meeting 36 43.83 5.676 32.7 54.96

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 45 48.97 5.503 38.18 59.76
Not Meeting 33 51.03 5.503 40.24 61.82

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 66 85.85 3.521 78.95 92.75
Not Meeting 12 14.15 3.521 7.251 21.05

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 21 25.72 4.726 16.46 34.98
Not Meeting 57 74.28 4.726 65.02 83.54

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 38 56.17 5.676 45.04 67.3
Not Meeting 36 43.83 5.676 32.7 54.96

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 43 57.47 4.878 47.91 67.03
Not Meeting 35 42.53 4.878 32.97 52.09

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 14 21.48 5.423 10.85 32.11
Not Meeting 41 78.52 5.423 67.89 89.15

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 28 33.1 5.023 23.25 42.94
Not Meeting 47 66.9 5.023 57.06 76.75

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 33 38.33 5.455 27.63 49.02
Not Meeting 41 61.67 5.455 50.98 72.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 28 33.1 5.023 23.25 42.94
Not Meeting 47 66.9 5.023 57.06 76.75

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 33 38.33 5.455 27.63 49.02
Not Meeting 41 61.67 5.455 50.98 72.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 31 60.85 7.764 45.63 76.06
Not Meeting 17 39.15 7.764 23.94 54.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Big Jacks Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 44.45 22.37 0.6125 88.29
Not Meeting 2 55.55 22.37 11.71 99.39

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 44.45 22.37 0.6125 88.29
Not Meeting 2 55.55 22.37 11.71 99.39

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 99.87 0.1538 99.57 100
Not Meeting 1 0.1257 0.1538 0 0.4271

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 55.49 22.38 11.63 99.35
Not Meeting 4 44.51 22.38 0.6459 88.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 5 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 55.49 22.38 11.63 99.35
Not Meeting 4 44.51 22.38 0.6459 88.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 77.78 20.23 38.13 100
Not Meeting 1 22.22 20.23 0 61.87

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 49.98 33.92 0 100
Not Meeting 2 50.02 33.92 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 55.49 22.38 11.63 99.35
Not Meeting 4 44.51 22.38 0.6459 88.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 5 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 55.49 22.38 11.63 99.35
Not Meeting 4 44.51 22.38 0.6459 88.37

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 77.78 20.23 38.13 100
Not Meeting 1 22.22 20.23 0 61.87

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 0.09447 0.08995 0 0.2708
Not Meeting 3 99.91 0.08995 99.73 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 44.45 22.37 0.6125 88.29
Not Meeting 2 55.55 22.37 11.71 99.39

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 44.45 22.37 0.6125 88.29
Not Meeting 2 55.55 22.37 11.71 99.39

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Birch Creek-Snake River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 7.3 7.804 0 22.6
Not Meeting 3 92.7 7.804 77.4 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 49.94 25.48 0 99.88
Not Meeting 2 50.06 25.48 0.1204 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 30.54 15.74 0 61.39
Not Meeting 4 69.46 15.74 38.61 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 55.93 18.47 19.73 92.13
Not Meeting 3 44.07 18.47 7.872 80.27

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.5 15.99 0 50.84
Not Meeting 5 80.5 15.99 49.16 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 92.7 7.804 77.4 100
Not Meeting 1 7.3 7.804 0 22.6

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 30.54 15.74 0 61.39
Not Meeting 4 69.46 15.74 38.61 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 55.93 18.47 19.73 92.13
Not Meeting 3 44.07 18.47 7.872 80.27

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.5 15.99 0 50.84
Not Meeting 5 80.5 15.99 49.16 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 92.7 7.804 77.4 100
Not Meeting 1 7.3 7.804 0 22.6

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 30.54 15.74 0 61.39
Not Meeting 4 69.46 15.74 38.61 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 7.3 7.804 0 22.6
Not Meeting 3 92.7 7.804 77.4 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 49.94 25.48 0 99.88
Not Meeting 2 50.06 25.48 0.1204 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 3 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100
Not Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100
Not Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693
Not Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100
Not Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100
Not Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 1.461 2.159 0 5.693
Not Meeting 1 98.54 2.159 94.31 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 3 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 3 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Dickshooter Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 59.24 48.29 0 100
Not Meeting 1 40.76 48.29 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Jacks Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 15.99 16.08 0 47.51
Not Meeting 3 84.01 16.08 52.49 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 31.98 20.6 0 72.36
Not Meeting 2 68.02 20.6 27.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 84.01 16.08 52.49 100
Not Meeting 1 15.99 16.08 0 47.51

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 52.03 25.98 1.107 100
Not Meeting 3 47.97 25.98 0 98.89

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 31.98 20.6 0 72.36
Not Meeting 2 68.02 20.6 27.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 84.01 16.08 52.49 100
Not Meeting 1 15.99 16.08 0 47.51

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 52.03 25.98 1.107 100
Not Meeting 3 47.97 25.98 0 98.89

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 15.99 16.08 0 47.51
Not Meeting 3 84.01 16.08 52.49 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Little Jacks Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 23.09 22 0 66.21
Not Meeting 4 76.91 22 33.79 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 23.09 22 0 66.21
Not Meeting 4 76.91 22 33.79 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 46.23 40.38 0 100
Not Meeting 2 53.77 40.38 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 24.53 22.55 0 68.72
Not Meeting 2 75.47 22.55 31.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 6 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 6 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 1.433 1.447 0 4.269
Not Meeting 4 98.57 1.447 95.73 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 24.53 22.55 0 68.72
Not Meeting 2 75.47 22.55 31.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 6 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 6 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 1.433 1.447 0 4.269
Not Meeting 4 98.57 1.447 95.73 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 2.266 1.988 0 6.163
Not Meeting 2 97.73 1.988 93.84 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 23.09 22 0 66.21
Not Meeting 4 76.91 22 33.79 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 23.09 22 0 66.21
Not Meeting 4 76.91 22 33.79 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Lower Battle Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100
Not Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100
Not Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2
Not Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2
Not Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2
Not Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2
Not Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2
Not Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100
Not Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 80.45 31.45 18.8 100
Not Meeting 1 19.55 31.45 0 81.2

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Lower Sheep Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 30.5 22.74 0 75.06
Not Meeting 3 69.5 22.74 24.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 30.5 22.74 0 75.06
Not Meeting 3 69.5 22.74 24.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 27.22 39.62 0 100
Not Meeting 1 72.78 39.62 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 37.11 23.95 0 84.06
Not Meeting 3 62.89 23.95 15.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 58.09 23.95 11.16 100
Not Meeting 2 41.91 23.95 0 88.84

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 27.22 39.62 0 100
Not Meeting 1 72.78 39.62 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 37.11 23.95 0 84.06
Not Meeting 3 62.89 23.95 15.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 58.09 23.95 11.16 100
Not Meeting 2 41.91 23.95 0 88.84

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 51.48 23.07 6.27 96.7
Not Meeting 2 48.52 23.07 3.3 93.73

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 30.5 22.74 0 75.06
Not Meeting 3 69.5 22.74 24.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 30.5 22.74 0 75.06
Not Meeting 3 69.5 22.74 24.94 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Marys Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 51.69 49.94 0 100
Not Meeting 1 48.31 49.94 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : McDonald Creek-Bruneau River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83
Not Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83
Not Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100
Not Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100
Not Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83
Not Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.519 6.79 0 16.83
Not Meeting 1 96.48 6.79 83.17 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Middle Blue Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 27.94 20.22 0 67.57
Not Meeting 3 72.06 20.22 32.43 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 5 80.63 15.03 51.18 100
Not Meeting 1 19.37 15.03 0 48.82

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.37 15.03 0 48.82
Not Meeting 5 80.63 15.03 51.18 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 5 80.63 15.03 51.18 100
Not Meeting 1 19.37 15.03 0 48.82

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 19.37 15.03 0 48.82
Not Meeting 5 80.63 15.03 51.18 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 77.47 16.77 44.6 100
Not Meeting 2 22.53 16.77 0 55.4

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 3.159 3.348 0 9.722
Not Meeting 5 96.84 3.348 90.28 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Miller Water-Bruneau River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 11.76 12.19 0 35.64
Not Meeting 3 88.24 12.19 64.36 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100
Not Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100
Not Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 88.24 12.19 64.36 100
Not Meeting 1 11.76 12.19 0 35.64

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 76.49 35.97 5.998 100
Not Meeting 1 23.51 35.97 0 94

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100
Not Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100
Not Meeting 2 50 27.01 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 88.24 12.19 64.36 100
Not Meeting 1 11.76 12.19 0 35.64

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 38.24 27.04 0 91.23
Not Meeting 3 61.76 27.04 8.766 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 4 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 11.76 12.19 0 35.64
Not Meeting 3 88.24 12.19 64.36 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Pole Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 86.72 13.97 59.34 100
Not Meeting 1 13.28 13.97 0 40.66

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 86.72 13.97 59.34 100
Not Meeting 1 13.28 13.97 0 40.66

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 14.96 14.82 0 44.01
Not Meeting 2 85.04 14.82 55.99 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 99.16 1.068 97.07 100
Not Meeting 1 0.842 1.068 0 2.935

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 99.16 1.068 97.07 100
Not Meeting 1 0.842 1.068 0 2.935

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.842 1.079 0 2.956
Not Meeting 4 99.16 1.079 97.04 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 83.09 15.88 51.97 100
Not Meeting 2 16.91 15.88 0 48.03

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 5 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 99.16 1.068 97.07 100
Not Meeting 1 0.842 1.068 0 2.935

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 99.16 1.068 97.07 100
Not Meeting 1 0.842 1.068 0 2.935

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.842 1.079 0 2.956
Not Meeting 4 99.16 1.079 97.04 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 3 83.09 15.88 51.97 100
Not Meeting 2 16.91 15.88 0 48.03

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 5 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 86.72 13.97 59.34 100
Not Meeting 1 13.28 13.97 0 40.66

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 4 86.72 13.97 59.34 100
Not Meeting 1 13.28 13.97 0 40.66

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Ross Slough-Owyhee River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Shoofly Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100
Not Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.07277 0.1454 0 0.3578
Not Meeting 1 99.93 0.1454 99.64 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Upper Battle Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Sagebrush Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 32.8 44.08 0 100
Not Meeting 1 67.2 44.08 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Upper Blue Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100
Not Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811
Not Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100
Not Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811
Not Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100
Not Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811
Not Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100
Not Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 0.7793 1.547 0 3.811
Not Meeting 1 99.22 1.547 96.19 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Upper Sheep Creek

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 83.35 27.75 28.96 100
Not Meeting 1 16.65 27.75 0 71.04

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Overall Soil Stability Rating

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 83.35 27.75 28.96 100
Not Meeting 1 16.65 27.75 0 71.04

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Watershed : Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River

Management Question: Land Health Standard: Wildlife

Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Watershed

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: GRSG Habitat Objectives

Indicator: Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 1 50 50 0 100
Not Meeting 1 50 50 0 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Soils

Indicator: Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps > 200 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Indicator: Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity

Indicator: Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Not Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.


Management Question: Land Health Standard: Native Plants

Indicator: Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)

This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.

Results Table

Category # Points % Area Estimate Std. Error Lower 80% CI Upper 80% CI
Meeting 2 100 0 100 100

This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.



Spatial Distribution of Core Indicators

The USGS, in partnership with the BLM, has developed a series of shrubland remote-sensing products that predict the spatial distribution of many of the core indicators. This includes maps of shrub cover, sagebrush cover, bare ground, perennial grass cover, annual grass cover, and more. Land cover data from the USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2011 shows the distribution of general vegetation types in the study area. In some cases these maps represent indicators directly related to management questions. In other cases, these maps may show indicators that are related indirectly to a management question. In either case, these products can be very useful in beginning to understand WHERE resource concerns might be within a reporting unit or study area.

The map below depicts a selection of AIM indicators available from the USGS NLCD Shrublands Products and the NLCD 2011. The full suite of NLCD Shrubland products is available for download from USGS at https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcdshrub_avail.php. The NLCD 2011 data can be downloaded from https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_data.php.

This map is provided for general reference only. To maintain performance of the report document and keep file sizes small, the map products displayed here have been resampled from their native resolution (30m) to a scale of 120m resolution. For detailed analyses or for higher-quality maps, download the products from their source.


Appendices