Information about the health of the landscapes we manage is essential to achieve the BLM mission (Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976). It enables BLM to measure the benefits that these lands and waters provide, understand the effects of multiple uses, and thus create management plans to sustain these landscapes for future generations.
This report provides information about the health of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This information was collected on-the-ground by field biologists who measure and assess important indicators related to ecosystem health. In terrestrial ecosystems, they focus on cover and composition of plant species, plant height, gaps between plant canopies, and stability of soils. In aquatic ecosystems, they focus on water quality, stream morphology, and biological characteristics. These quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments were collected under the BLM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) program. For more information about AIM, see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org/learn-3/about/.
This report also includes relevant standard geospatial datasets. Some relate to ecosystem health, while others provide contextual information about landscapes such as the management activities occurring there.
This report was generated through partnership among the BLM National Operations Center, USDA-ARS Jornada, and the BLM National Aquatic Monitoring Center.
The purpose of this report is to describe key indicators of ecosystem health across an area of interest. This information can be used to evaluate whether or not goals or desired conditions are being achieved across BLM lands, an essential step in adaptive management. Specific management applications include but are not limited to: treatment effectiveness, Land Health Standards evaluation, sage-grouse habitat analysis and Resource Management Plan effectiveness. Tables, graphs, and other content from this report can be pasted into decision-making documents, or the entire report can be used as an appendix to such documents.
The standard core indicators contained in this report are relevant to management questions across all BLM ecosystem types, as identified through the BLM AIM Strategy and related efforts (TN440, TR1735-1). This report also contains standard national geospatial datasets managed by the BLM National Operations Center and partners. These geospatial datasets provide spatial and management context for the standard AIM core indicators.
This report has five main sections. The introduction sets the stage. The data summary provides contextual information that is helpful for interpreting the results, including the list of indicators, time period, timing of sampling, and maps.
Report results begin with the goals, monitoring objectives, benchmarks, and results summary section. This contains tables of which indicators met specified objectdives by reporting unit, and a summary of the stated objectdives. These table can be used by BLM land managers to evaluate whether goals or management objectives were achieved. This table is a summary of results for all indicators.
The indicator estimates by reporting unit for monitoring objectives section identifies the condition of each indicator for each area of interest or reporting unit. Condition refers to the proportion of land or water resources that is achieving desired values known as benchmarks. This section provides further detail about each row of the table in the previous section and can be used as supporting information for the conclusions drawn from that table. This is followed by the spatial distribution of core indicators section which provides remote-sensing-derived maps of various core indicators for the study area.
Finally, the appendices contain additional background information on AIM, the core indicators and methods, and the analysis approaches used to generate this reports.
This report summarizes and analyzes information collected from an AIM project. The following information sources were used in the analysis presented in this report:
Results in this report can be used to evaluate whether goals regarding ecosystem health are being achieved across a landscape. Success criteria for each goal are specified as measureable monitoring objectives that include a natural resource indicator of interest, a benchmark that identifies desired values of that indicator, and the proportion of the landscape that should meet the benchmark. This report provides statistical estimates of the proportion of the landscape achieving the monitoring objectives, in the form of tables, graphs and other information (see summary in objectives, benchmarks, and landscape thresholds or detailed info in condition estimates by objective). BLM land managers requesting the report supplied relevant goals, monitoring objectives and reporting units as part of the process of designing their monitoring effort (see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org/design). Upon receipt, it will be the responsibility of BLM land managers to evaluate whether goals are achieved and make management recommendations.
Consider important contextual information when you evaluate whether goals are achieved:
In addition to this report from which charts and tablar data can be copied/pasted, the following standard outputs are created as part of this analysis:
For additional information, please see http://aim.landscapetoolbox.org or contact ekachergis@blm.gov.
The following tabs contain tables and graphs describing the information in this report and the sampling effort. This includes the indicators being considered, the time period of sampling, descriptions of the actual sampling effort relative to the original sampling design, and a map of the sample points and reporting units.
The map below is provided for general reference only. It was created from the spatial data stored in the project’s Sample Design Database, the reporting units provided for this analysis, and the actual sample point locations recorded in TerrADat. The map is dynamic - you can pan and zoom it. Layers may also be toggled on/off to view specific features.
The following indicators were specified in the AIM data analysis template and are included in this report:
Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm)
Average Sagebrush Height (cm)
Bare Soil (%)
Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%)
Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit)
Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit)
Overall Soil Stability Rating
Percent in Gaps > 200 cm
Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm
Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm
Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit)
This report covers data collected between 2015-06-02 and 2016-08-03. Timing of the data collection in each year is shown below.
Not all points originally selected as part of a design can be sampled. Selected points may not be accessible or when evaluated may be deemed to not even be part of the population. The Rejection Criteria page on the AIM Landscape Toolbox website describes the rejection criteria for evaluating plots. To properly adjust the sampling weights and ensure unbiased estimates, it is important to know the fate of each of the originally-selected points. The graph below summarizes the point fates for the sample design(s) considered in this report.
Target sampled points are those that occurred on BLM lands and were visited by a field crew. Inaccessible points were ones that were on BLM lands, but for one reason or another, the crew could not physically access the site (e.g., needed to cross private land and access was denied, road was washed out). Non-target points refers to points that upon evaluation were determined to not be on BLM lands or occurred in water. Unknown points are those for which their fate was not recorded. If sampling objectives (e.g., condition estimate or confidence interval width) were achieved without sampling all of the selected points, then any excess points could be marked as Unneeded (this is not common in terrestrial AIM studies).
The initial designs considered for this report used stratification as a way to spread sampling effort across the study area. The extent to which estimates calculated from monitoring data reflect conditions across the study area depends on whether or not the strata were adequately sampled. It is not uncommon for some sample sites to be not visited for various reasons (e.g., inaccessibility, time ran out). This is typically not a problem as long as: 1) the missed points do not account for a majority of the selected sample points and 2) the points that were not sampled were missed at random (i.e, there was no pattern to which points were missed and which were sampled). The table below summarizes the total calculated area and estimated sampling area by design stratum for the study area. Separate strata sampling proportions are calculated for each reporting unit, but looking at the study area overall gives a good rough estimation of whether or not there were issues with how the sample data represents the different strata. If there are strata with very low sampled proportions, this may affect the ability to draw inferences beyond the sample data in these strata, and should be more thoroughly evaluated.
| Design Stratum | # Design Points | # Sampled Points | Prop. Design Points Sampled | Estimated Stratum Area (ha) | Stratum Area Sampled | Calculated Point Weight (ha/pt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basin_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist | 13 | 9 | 0.69 | 7492.63 | 5187.20 | 576.36 |
| Big_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist | 18 | 10 | 0.56 | 62328.47 | 34626.93 | 3462.69 |
| Big_Sagebrush_Warm_Dry | 33 | 12 | 0.36 | 164495.67 | 59816.61 | 4984.72 |
| Black_Sagebrush | 13 | 9 | 0.69 | 17180.00 | 11893.85 | 1321.54 |
| Low_Sagebrush_Cool_Moist | 37 | 20 | 0.54 | 204141.18 | 110346.58 | 5517.33 |
| Low_Sagebrush_Warm_Dry | 13 | 7 | 0.54 | 10305.80 | 5549.28 | 792.75 |
| Meadow_Dry | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 631.14 | 315.57 | 157.79 |
| Salt_Desert_Mix | 22 | 7 | 0.32 | 85976.33 | 27356.10 | 3908.01 |
| Unknown_&_Aspen | 14 | 2 | 0.14 | 36810.18 | 5258.60 | 2629.30 |
This table summarizes the results of this report. It contains broad goals as well as monitoring objectives and whether they were achieved based on available monitoring data for the area of interest. Monitoring objectives include key indicators, benchmarks that define desired values of the indicators, and the proportion of the landscape required to meet benchmarks. Together, this information can be used by BLM land managers to determine whether goals are being achieved and to recommend changes in management, if needed.
Note that the Monitoring Objectives and Benchmarks listed here are directly from the Terrestrial Benchmark Workbook that was filled out by the field office.
| Managment Question | Indicator | Objective Met? | Reporting Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Bruneau Field Office |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Likely No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Possibly No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Possibly No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Big Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | No | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Likely No | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Likely No | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Likely No | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Likely No | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Bruneau Valley-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | No | Little Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | No | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Likely No | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Likely No | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Likely No | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Possibly No | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Possibly No | Pole Creek |
| Managment Question | Indicator | Objective Met? | Reporting Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Birch Creek-Snake River |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Dickshooter Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Jacks Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Lower Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Battle Creek |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Lower Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Marys Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | McDonald Creek-Bruneau River |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Middle Blue Creek |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Miller Water-Bruneau River |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Pole Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Ross Slough-Owyhee River |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Shoofly Creek |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Upper Battle Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Upper Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Blue Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Sheep Creek |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | At threshold | Upper Sheep Creek |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | At threshold | Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | At threshold | Yatahoney Creek-Owyhee River |
These tables below summarize the results of specific indicators that were evaluated against management objectives and reporting units that were defined in the Monitoring Design Worksheet. A seprate table is presented for each reporting unit, and these tables state the indicators, evaluation categories, and required landscape proportion that should be met for each management question. The estimated proportion of the reporting unit in the different categories, upper and lower confidence intervals (CI), and a statement of whether the stated objective was met (based on the required landscape percent) are also presented.This information can be used by BLM land managers to determine whether goals are being achieved and to recommend changes in management, if needed.
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 14 | 21.48 | 10.85 | 32.11 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 43 | 57.47 | 47.91 | 67.03 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 33 | 38.33 | 27.63 | 49.02 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 33 | 38.33 | 27.63 | 49.02 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 38 | 56.17 | 45.04 | 67.30 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 38 | 56.17 | 45.04 | 67.30 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 33 | 38.33 | 27.63 | 49.02 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 33 | 38.33 | 27.63 | 49.02 | No |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 49.98 | 0.00 | 100.00 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.27 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 3 | 44.45 | 0.61 | 88.29 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 3 | 44.45 | 0.61 | 88.29 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 77.78 | 38.13 | 100.00 | Possibly No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 77.78 | 38.13 | 100.00 | Possibly No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 3 | 44.45 | 0.61 | 88.29 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 3 | 44.45 | 0.61 | 88.29 | No |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 30.54 | 0.00 | 61.39 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 49.94 | 0.00 | 99.88 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 49.94 | 0.00 | 99.88 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 92.70 | 77.40 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 92.70 | 77.40 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 49.94 | 0.00 | 99.88 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 49.94 | 0.00 | 99.88 | Likely No |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 5.69 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 5.69 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 40.76 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 59.24 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 59.24 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 59.24 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 59.24 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 15.99 | 0.00 | 47.51 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 15.99 | 0.00 | 47.51 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 52.03 | 1.11 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 52.03 | 1.11 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 15.99 | 0.00 | 47.51 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 15.99 | 0.00 | 47.51 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 4 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 6.16 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 23.09 | 0.00 | 66.21 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 23.09 | 0.00 | 66.21 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 4.27 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 4.27 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 23.09 | 0.00 | 66.21 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 23.09 | 0.00 | 66.21 | No |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 80.45 | 18.80 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 80.45 | 18.80 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 80.45 | 18.80 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 80.45 | 18.80 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 27.22 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 51.48 | 6.27 | 96.70 | No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 30.50 | 0.00 | 75.06 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 30.50 | 0.00 | 75.06 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 58.09 | 11.16 | 100.00 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 58.09 | 11.16 | 100.00 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 30.50 | 0.00 | 75.06 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 30.50 | 0.00 | 75.06 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 51.69 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 51.69 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 51.69 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 51.69 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 51.69 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 16.83 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 16.83 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 96.48 | 83.17 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 96.48 | 83.17 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 16.83 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 16.83 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 4 | 77.47 | 44.60 | 100.00 | Likely No |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 9.72 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 76.49 | 6.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 38.24 | 0.00 | 91.23 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 11.76 | 0.00 | 35.64 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 11.76 | 0.00 | 35.64 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 88.24 | 64.36 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 88.24 | 64.36 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 11.76 | 0.00 | 35.64 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 11.76 | 0.00 | 35.64 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 5 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 4 | 86.72 | 59.34 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 4 | 86.72 | 59.34 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 83.09 | 51.97 | 100.00 | Possibly No |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 3 | 83.09 | 51.97 | 100.00 | Possibly No |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 4 | 86.72 | 59.34 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 4 | 86.72 | 59.34 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 99.93 | 99.64 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.36 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.36 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.36 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.36 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.36 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 67.20 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 32.80 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 32.80 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 3.81 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 3.81 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 83.35 | 28.96 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | 1 | 83.35 | 28.96 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % |
| Management Question | Indicator | Category | Required Percent | n | Estimated Percent | Lower CI | Upper CI | Objective Met? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 1 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Meeting | >= 90 % | |||||
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Meeting | >= 80 % | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | At threshold |
| Management Question | Indicator | Benchmark Source | Evaluation Stratum | Category | Evaluation Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Meeting | 15<= SagebrushCover_AH <=25 |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= SagebrushCover_AH <15 |
| GRSG Habitat Objectives | Sagebrush Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 25< SagebrushCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= InvAnnGrassCover_AH <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Biotic Integrity | Invasive Annual Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< InvAnnGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Warm Dry | Meeting | 10<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Dry Meadow | Meeting | 35<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=50 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 20<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=40 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 20<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=45 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Salt Desert Mix | Meeting | 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Unknown/Aspen | Meeting | 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=35 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Black Sage | Meeting | 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Warm Dry | Meeting | 5<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Basin Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 10<= TotalLitterCover_FH <=25 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Basin Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Black Sage | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Black Sage | Not Meeting | 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Basin Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <20 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 45< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Salt Desert Mix | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Salt Desert Mix | Not Meeting | 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Dry Meadow | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <35 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Dry Meadow | Not Meeting | 50< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 25< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <20 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Unknown/Aspen | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Unknown/Aspen | Not Meeting | 35< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 40< TotalLitterCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Hydrologic Function | Between-Canopy Herbaceous and Woody Litter (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 0<= TotalLitterCover_FH <5 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Meeting | 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Outside GRSG PHMA | Meeting | 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites outside PHMA | Meeting | 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites outside PHMA | Meeting | 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Outside GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites outside PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites outside PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15 |
| Land Health Standard: Native Plants | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Basin Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <35 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <35 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Warm Dry | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Cool Moist | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Warm Dry | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <45 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Black Sage | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <25 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Dry Meadow | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <25 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Salt Desert Mix | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <50 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Unknown/Aspen | Meeting | 0<= BareSoilCover_FH <30 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Loamy Soils | Meeting | 4<= SoilStability_All <=6 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Sandy Soils | Meeting | 2<= SoilStability_All <=6 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps > 200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_200_plus <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_101_200 <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_51_100 <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Dry Meadow | Not Meeting | 25<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Salt Desert Mix | Not Meeting | 50<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Black Sage | Not Meeting | 25<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Unknown/Aspen | Not Meeting | 30<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Basin Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 35<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 35<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Big Sage Warm Dry | Not Meeting | 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Bare Soil (%) | Ecological Site Descriptions | Low Sage Cool Moist | Not Meeting | 45<= BareSoilCover_FH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Loamy Soils | Not Meeting | 0<= SoilStability_All <4 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Sandy Soils | Not Meeting | 0<= SoilStability_All <2 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps > 200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_200_plus <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_101_200 <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Soils | Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_51_100 <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Sandy Soils | Meeting | 2<= SoilStability_All <=6 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Loamy Soils | Meeting | 4<= SoilStability_All <=6 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps > 200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_200_plus <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_101_200 <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Meeting | 0<= GapPct_51_100 <=10 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Sandy Soils | Not Meeting | 0<= SoilStability_All <2 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Overall Soil Stability Rating | Ecological Site Descriptions | Loamy Soils | Not Meeting | 0<= SoilStability_All <4 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps > 200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_200_plus <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps 101-200 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_101_200 <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Watershed | Percent in Gaps 51-100 cm | Ecological Site Descriptions | Study Area | Not Meeting | 10< GapPct_51_100 <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Meeting | 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Outside GRSG PHMA | Meeting | 17.8<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <=500 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 30<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=80 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 40<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=80 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Meeting | 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites outside PHMA | Meeting | 10<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites outside PHMA | Meeting | 15<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | In GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Non-invasive Perennial Grass Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Outside GRSG PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassHgt_Avg <17.8 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <=30 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 80< SagebrushHgt_Avg <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= SagebrushHgt_Avg <40 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Average Sagebrush Height (cm) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 80< SagebrushHgt_Avg <=100 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites in PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Arid Sites outside PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <10 |
| Land Health Standard: Wildlife | Non-invasive Perennial Grass Cover (%, any hit) | Policy - HAF | Mesic Sites outside PHMA | Not Meeting | 0<= NonInvPerenGrassCover_AH <15 |
This section identifies the condition of each indicator for each area of interest or reporting unit. Condition refers to the proportion of land or water resources that is achieving desired values known as benchmarks. This section provides further detail about each row of the table in the previous section and can be used as supporting information for the conclusions drawn from that table. Specifically, for each indicator, the following are reported:
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 45 | 48.97 | 5.503 | 38.18 | 59.76 |
| Not Meeting | 33 | 51.03 | 5.503 | 40.24 | 61.82 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 66 | 85.85 | 3.521 | 78.95 | 92.75 |
| Not Meeting | 12 | 14.15 | 3.521 | 7.251 | 21.05 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 21 | 25.72 | 4.726 | 16.46 | 34.98 |
| Not Meeting | 57 | 74.28 | 4.726 | 65.02 | 83.54 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 38 | 56.17 | 5.676 | 45.04 | 67.3 |
| Not Meeting | 36 | 43.83 | 5.676 | 32.7 | 54.96 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 45 | 48.97 | 5.503 | 38.18 | 59.76 |
| Not Meeting | 33 | 51.03 | 5.503 | 40.24 | 61.82 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 66 | 85.85 | 3.521 | 78.95 | 92.75 |
| Not Meeting | 12 | 14.15 | 3.521 | 7.251 | 21.05 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 21 | 25.72 | 4.726 | 16.46 | 34.98 |
| Not Meeting | 57 | 74.28 | 4.726 | 65.02 | 83.54 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 38 | 56.17 | 5.676 | 45.04 | 67.3 |
| Not Meeting | 36 | 43.83 | 5.676 | 32.7 | 54.96 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 43 | 57.47 | 4.878 | 47.91 | 67.03 |
| Not Meeting | 35 | 42.53 | 4.878 | 32.97 | 52.09 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 14 | 21.48 | 5.423 | 10.85 | 32.11 |
| Not Meeting | 41 | 78.52 | 5.423 | 67.89 | 89.15 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 28 | 33.1 | 5.023 | 23.25 | 42.94 |
| Not Meeting | 47 | 66.9 | 5.023 | 57.06 | 76.75 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 33 | 38.33 | 5.455 | 27.63 | 49.02 |
| Not Meeting | 41 | 61.67 | 5.455 | 50.98 | 72.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 28 | 33.1 | 5.023 | 23.25 | 42.94 |
| Not Meeting | 47 | 66.9 | 5.023 | 57.06 | 76.75 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 33 | 38.33 | 5.455 | 27.63 | 49.02 |
| Not Meeting | 41 | 61.67 | 5.455 | 50.98 | 72.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 31 | 60.85 | 7.764 | 45.63 | 76.06 |
| Not Meeting | 17 | 39.15 | 7.764 | 23.94 | 54.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 44.45 | 22.37 | 0.6125 | 88.29 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 55.55 | 22.37 | 11.71 | 99.39 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 44.45 | 22.37 | 0.6125 | 88.29 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 55.55 | 22.37 | 11.71 | 99.39 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 99.87 | 0.1538 | 99.57 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.1257 | 0.1538 | 0 | 0.4271 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 55.49 | 22.38 | 11.63 | 99.35 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 44.51 | 22.38 | 0.6459 | 88.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 55.49 | 22.38 | 11.63 | 99.35 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 44.51 | 22.38 | 0.6459 | 88.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 77.78 | 20.23 | 38.13 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 22.22 | 20.23 | 0 | 61.87 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 49.98 | 33.92 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50.02 | 33.92 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 55.49 | 22.38 | 11.63 | 99.35 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 44.51 | 22.38 | 0.6459 | 88.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 55.49 | 22.38 | 11.63 | 99.35 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 44.51 | 22.38 | 0.6459 | 88.37 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 77.78 | 20.23 | 38.13 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 22.22 | 20.23 | 0 | 61.87 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 0.09447 | 0.08995 | 0 | 0.2708 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 99.91 | 0.08995 | 99.73 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 44.45 | 22.37 | 0.6125 | 88.29 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 55.55 | 22.37 | 11.71 | 99.39 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 44.45 | 22.37 | 0.6125 | 88.29 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 55.55 | 22.37 | 11.71 | 99.39 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 7.3 | 7.804 | 0 | 22.6 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 92.7 | 7.804 | 77.4 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 49.94 | 25.48 | 0 | 99.88 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50.06 | 25.48 | 0.1204 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 30.54 | 15.74 | 0 | 61.39 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 69.46 | 15.74 | 38.61 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 55.93 | 18.47 | 19.73 | 92.13 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 44.07 | 18.47 | 7.872 | 80.27 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.5 | 15.99 | 0 | 50.84 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 80.5 | 15.99 | 49.16 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 92.7 | 7.804 | 77.4 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 7.3 | 7.804 | 0 | 22.6 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 30.54 | 15.74 | 0 | 61.39 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 69.46 | 15.74 | 38.61 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 55.93 | 18.47 | 19.73 | 92.13 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 44.07 | 18.47 | 7.872 | 80.27 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.5 | 15.99 | 0 | 50.84 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 80.5 | 15.99 | 49.16 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 92.7 | 7.804 | 77.4 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 7.3 | 7.804 | 0 | 22.6 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 30.54 | 15.74 | 0 | 61.39 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 69.46 | 15.74 | 38.61 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 7.3 | 7.804 | 0 | 22.6 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 92.7 | 7.804 | 77.4 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 49.94 | 25.48 | 0 | 99.88 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50.06 | 25.48 | 0.1204 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 3 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 1.461 | 2.159 | 0 | 5.693 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 98.54 | 2.159 | 94.31 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 3 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 3 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 59.24 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 40.76 | 48.29 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 15.99 | 16.08 | 0 | 47.51 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 84.01 | 16.08 | 52.49 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 31.98 | 20.6 | 0 | 72.36 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 68.02 | 20.6 | 27.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 84.01 | 16.08 | 52.49 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 15.99 | 16.08 | 0 | 47.51 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 52.03 | 25.98 | 1.107 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 47.97 | 25.98 | 0 | 98.89 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 31.98 | 20.6 | 0 | 72.36 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 68.02 | 20.6 | 27.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 84.01 | 16.08 | 52.49 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 15.99 | 16.08 | 0 | 47.51 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 52.03 | 25.98 | 1.107 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 47.97 | 25.98 | 0 | 98.89 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 15.99 | 16.08 | 0 | 47.51 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 84.01 | 16.08 | 52.49 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 23.09 | 22 | 0 | 66.21 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 76.91 | 22 | 33.79 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 23.09 | 22 | 0 | 66.21 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 76.91 | 22 | 33.79 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 46.23 | 40.38 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 53.77 | 40.38 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 24.53 | 22.55 | 0 | 68.72 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 75.47 | 22.55 | 31.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 6 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 6 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 1.433 | 1.447 | 0 | 4.269 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 98.57 | 1.447 | 95.73 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 24.53 | 22.55 | 0 | 68.72 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 75.47 | 22.55 | 31.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 6 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 6 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 1.433 | 1.447 | 0 | 4.269 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 98.57 | 1.447 | 95.73 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 2.266 | 1.988 | 0 | 6.163 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 97.73 | 1.988 | 93.84 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 23.09 | 22 | 0 | 66.21 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 76.91 | 22 | 33.79 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 23.09 | 22 | 0 | 66.21 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 76.91 | 22 | 33.79 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 80.45 | 31.45 | 18.8 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.55 | 31.45 | 0 | 81.2 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 30.5 | 22.74 | 0 | 75.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 69.5 | 22.74 | 24.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 30.5 | 22.74 | 0 | 75.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 69.5 | 22.74 | 24.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 27.22 | 39.62 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 72.78 | 39.62 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 37.11 | 23.95 | 0 | 84.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 62.89 | 23.95 | 15.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 58.09 | 23.95 | 11.16 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 41.91 | 23.95 | 0 | 88.84 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 27.22 | 39.62 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 72.78 | 39.62 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 37.11 | 23.95 | 0 | 84.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 62.89 | 23.95 | 15.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 58.09 | 23.95 | 11.16 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 41.91 | 23.95 | 0 | 88.84 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 51.48 | 23.07 | 6.27 | 96.7 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 48.52 | 23.07 | 3.3 | 93.73 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 30.5 | 22.74 | 0 | 75.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 69.5 | 22.74 | 24.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 30.5 | 22.74 | 0 | 75.06 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 69.5 | 22.74 | 24.94 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 51.69 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 48.31 | 49.94 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.519 | 6.79 | 0 | 16.83 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 96.48 | 6.79 | 83.17 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 27.94 | 20.22 | 0 | 67.57 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 72.06 | 20.22 | 32.43 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 5 | 80.63 | 15.03 | 51.18 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.37 | 15.03 | 0 | 48.82 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.37 | 15.03 | 0 | 48.82 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 80.63 | 15.03 | 51.18 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 5 | 80.63 | 15.03 | 51.18 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 19.37 | 15.03 | 0 | 48.82 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 19.37 | 15.03 | 0 | 48.82 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 80.63 | 15.03 | 51.18 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 77.47 | 16.77 | 44.6 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 22.53 | 16.77 | 0 | 55.4 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 3.159 | 3.348 | 0 | 9.722 |
| Not Meeting | 5 | 96.84 | 3.348 | 90.28 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 11.76 | 12.19 | 0 | 35.64 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 88.24 | 12.19 | 64.36 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 88.24 | 12.19 | 64.36 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 11.76 | 12.19 | 0 | 35.64 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 76.49 | 35.97 | 5.998 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 23.51 | 35.97 | 0 | 94 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 50 | 27.01 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 88.24 | 12.19 | 64.36 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 11.76 | 12.19 | 0 | 35.64 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 38.24 | 27.04 | 0 | 91.23 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 61.76 | 27.04 | 8.766 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 4 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 11.76 | 12.19 | 0 | 35.64 |
| Not Meeting | 3 | 88.24 | 12.19 | 64.36 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 86.72 | 13.97 | 59.34 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 13.28 | 13.97 | 0 | 40.66 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 86.72 | 13.97 | 59.34 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 13.28 | 13.97 | 0 | 40.66 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 14.96 | 14.82 | 0 | 44.01 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 85.04 | 14.82 | 55.99 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.068 | 97.07 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.068 | 0 | 2.935 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.068 | 97.07 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.068 | 0 | 2.935 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.079 | 0 | 2.956 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.079 | 97.04 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 83.09 | 15.88 | 51.97 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 16.91 | 15.88 | 0 | 48.03 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.068 | 97.07 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.068 | 0 | 2.935 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.068 | 97.07 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.068 | 0 | 2.935 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.842 | 1.079 | 0 | 2.956 |
| Not Meeting | 4 | 99.16 | 1.079 | 97.04 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 3 | 83.09 | 15.88 | 51.97 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 2 | 16.91 | 15.88 | 0 | 48.03 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 86.72 | 13.97 | 59.34 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 13.28 | 13.97 | 0 | 40.66 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 4 | 86.72 | 13.97 | 59.34 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 13.28 | 13.97 | 0 | 40.66 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.07277 | 0.1454 | 0 | 0.3578 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.93 | 0.1454 | 99.64 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 32.8 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 67.2 | 44.08 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 0.7793 | 1.547 | 0 | 3.811 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 99.22 | 1.547 | 96.19 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 83.35 | 27.75 | 28.96 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 16.65 | 27.75 | 0 | 71.04 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 83.35 | 27.75 | 28.96 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 16.65 | 27.75 | 0 | 71.04 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
| Not Meeting | 1 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
This graph shows the estimated percentage of the reporting unit in different categories for the specified indicator. 80% confidence intervals (CI) around those estimates are provided as error bars. The yellow bar denotes the landscape criterion, or point at which an objective is deemed to be met or not met as defined in the Sample Design Worksheet.
| Category | # Points | % Area Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 80% CI | Upper 80% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting | 2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
This table gives the analysis results for the specified indicator and reporting unit, and contains the data used to create the graph above.
The USGS, in partnership with the BLM, has developed a series of shrubland remote-sensing products that predict the spatial distribution of many of the core indicators. This includes maps of shrub cover, sagebrush cover, bare ground, perennial grass cover, annual grass cover, and more. Land cover data from the USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2011 shows the distribution of general vegetation types in the study area. In some cases these maps represent indicators directly related to management questions. In other cases, these maps may show indicators that are related indirectly to a management question. In either case, these products can be very useful in beginning to understand WHERE resource concerns might be within a reporting unit or study area.
The map below depicts a selection of AIM indicators available from the USGS NLCD Shrublands Products and the NLCD 2011. The full suite of NLCD Shrubland products is available for download from USGS at https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcdshrub_avail.php. The NLCD 2011 data can be downloaded from https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_data.php.
This map is provided for general reference only. To maintain performance of the report document and keep file sizes small, the map products displayed here have been resampled from their native resolution (30m) to a scale of 120m resolution. For detailed analyses or for higher-quality maps, download the products from their source.